Preview, Whistler Centenary at the Hunterian Art Gallery

Whistler

James Abott McNeill Whistler was born in 1834 in the cotton-spinning town of Lowell, Massachussets, son of a successful railway engineer. He was, in his own words, a “painter, Gentleman and critic” and in the words of others, a poseur, a flâneur, a dandy, and a wit. He spent his adult life challenging the artistic establishments of London and Paris, and producing iconic works which defy categorisation. He died one hundred years ago, and this week sees the launch of the world’s largest Whistler centenary celebration at the Hunterian Art Gallery and other venues across Glasgow.

Whistler was part Scottish, and so was his wife Beatrix: this meant a lot to the artist and although he visited Scotland only once, he exhibited and sold here frequently, forming strong relationships with dealer Alexander Reid and collector William Burrell. The Glasgow Boys called him “The Master”, and as a result of their lobbying, Glasgow City became the first public body to buy a work by Whistler (his portrait of Scottish historian and philosopher Thomas Carlyle, currently at the McLellan Galleries).

Whistler is most famous today for the near-abstract portrait of his mother (see panel) and for his Nocturnes, those misty, flat apparitions of bridges and piers where pin-prick orange lights haunt the muted waters. A friend of Manet and Degas, he was closely associated with the Impressionists, but he was also strongly affected first by Courbet’s uncompromising realism, and then by Ingres’s attention to the more formal qualities of line and colour.

“Whistler is in many ways a standalone figure whose art challenged established conventions of what a painting is, in terms of its finish or its subject matter,” says Pamela Robertson, Senior Curator at the Hunterian. “He felt that in its purest form painting was an arrangement of colour and tone on a surface and it didn’t have to show the preacher’s wife feeding her children, or something taken from history painting. He was progressive and it has rightly been said that he started the move towards abstraction.”

Such a move would inevitably meet with strong resistance, and on top of frequent rejection from the Royal Academy and the Salon, Whistler’s reputation plunged when in 1877 the critic John Ruskin wrote of Nocturne in Blue and Gold: Old Battersea Bridge, “I have seen, and heard, much of Cockney impudence before now; but never expected to hear a coxcomb ask two hundred guineas for flinging a pot of paint in the public’s face.” Whistler sued, and in court he answered accusations of charging such a fee for only two days work with the defence, “No, I ask it for the knowledge of a lifetime.” The artist won a derisory farthing in damages, leaving him with legal fees which were to bankrupt him.

Whistler, however, had media savvy. He turned his notoriety to advantage, waging wars of words in the letters pages, and as Robin Spencer has put it, “By the late 1880s anything connected with Whistler quickly became international ‘copy’, and was automatically syndicated by the world’s press.” His reputation for bon mots matched Oscar Wilde’s, and indeed when Wilde once said to him “I wish I had said that,” Whistler is reputed to have replied, “You will, Oscar, you will.”

Because of his celebrated wit, Whistler’s more private side is less well-known, but from tomorrow (Monday 16th) the world will get to see it for the first time, as Glasgow University’s Centre for Whistler Studies publishes the first tranche of its collection of 13,000 Whistler letters on the internet. Professor Nigel Thorp, the Centre’s Director, believes that this will open up a whole new aspect of the artist’s character: “Despite this very carefully contrived public figure, he comes across in his private correspondence as a very honest and straightforward person looking through a great deal of doubt and a great deal of hesitation and striving for an artistic ideal. For the people who knew Whistler only as a kind of flamboyant poseur this would be a revelation.”


Whistler’s Mother


Whistler’s Mother (Arrangement in Grey and Black No.1,1871) does not leave her home at the Musée d’Orsay very often, and her arrival in Glasgow this Wednesday will be her first time in Scotland since her visit to the Kelvingrove in 1951. “It is exceptional for the painting to be lent,” says Pamela Robertson, Senior Curator at the Hunterian. “It’s been absolutely key for us because it’s an iconic image. The Art Institute of Chicago was very keen to have the painting after us but Paris did not agree to that, so it is a great gesture by them to acknowledge the Whistler centenery and also the importance of the collections here.”

Anna Matilda McNeill was of Scottish descent, and a stern protestant. “She was very manipulative, and she was a great nag,” according to Georgia Toutziari, Editor of Whistler’s mother’s letters, and curator of Anna Whistler – A Life. “She was very domestic, very religious, very traditional and very ordinary for the time. She believed that women had to stay in the arena of the homefront – stay in the house and be good wives and good Christian mothers. But at the same time she was quite assertive and quite dynamic in her own way, but it didn’t really help with Whistler!”

“Whistler was always an eccentric, a disobedient person especially when he was a teenager. When he decided that he wanted to become an artist his mother tried to get him various jobs, but he went to Paris. He did not see his mother for some eight years and then she decided that she had to join him in London and so before Whistler knew, he was living with his mother again!”

Anna did make herself useful, selling her son’s work to her American friends, befriending his patron’s wives and acting as intermediary when rows broke out. Robertson points out that Whistler “always seemed to have a loyal loving woman whether it was his long term mistresses or his wife or his mother to bring that sort of necessary emotional and practical support.”

The iconic painting, which millions flocked to view when it was shown in America in 1934, was actually an accident of fate: “It was just a chance moment in his studio,” says Robertson. “A model had failed to turn up and so he chose to paint his mother. He wasn’t really an artist who was particularly engaged with old age – he did favour beautiful young women so it was rather unplanned. She was originally standing up, but it was just too exhausting for her, so again it was external factors that led to it rather than any grand plan.”

Catrìona Black, Sunday Herald 15.06.03