Lucian
Freud: Etchings 1946-2004
Until June 13; Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh
Theres something about the truth thats hard to define.
To make a true representation of a person, is it the surface of their
body that counts? Is it their eyes - that window on the soul
or should we ignore the outward quirks of fate and use visual metaphors
to conjure up the invisible essence of the subject?
Of course there are no easy answers, and since the art worlds
appetite for figurative painting waned ten years ago, few people care.
One notable exception is Lucian Freud, Sigmunds grandson, who
started making art in the 1940s and whose unique and timeless vision
of humanity is still as intense today and as unequivocally
true as it was all those decades ago.
While the Wallace Collection in London shows Freuds recent paintings,
The Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art wins the honour of staging
the first ever museum retrospective of the artists etchings.
Almost every print Freud ever made is in this show, along with a smattering
of paintings for comparative purposes.
Freuds undisputed draughtsmanship lends itself to printmaking,
and it is strange that although he made a handful of etchings at the
outset of his career, he abandoned the medium for 40 years until the
1980s. As a result, the gradual unfurling of the artists mature
voice a process usually revealed in the spotlight of a retrospective
is missing here. From the illustrative naivety of the first
room we are catapulted into the fully fledged viscerality of an artist
at the height of his prowess.
Freud is best known for his incisive paintings of family and friends,
where controlled throngs of chalky colours bind together to portray
the muscles and bones over which skin is little more than a translucent
wrap. That Freud wears a butchers apron in his studio is apt.
His subjects the people and animals he loves are meat,
grissle, bones and pubic hair without an ounce of sentimentality.
Because his sitters are not self-conscious in the face of Freuds
unflinching analysis, the result is dignified. It is true. These people
are not shown as products of their environment or as players in the
game of life. They often lie naked, preoccupied or asleep, in a pictorial
vacuum. They are not at a table with their books, wearing their Sunday
best, or engaging the viewer with a quizzical stare; they are not
trying to be someone they are simply being.
Freuds etchings are by no means poor cousins to his paintings,
and in fact the small oil study of his mother from 1972 is full of
tiny hatches and stipples like an etching simply bursting to get out.
His masterly use of the line, here in smooth sworls, and there in
bold scars, creates a vast range of tonal subtlety, while some of
his bold compositions rely almost entirely on black contours against
white flesh.
Perhaps the biggest surprise of this exhibition is that Freud doesnt
even need colour to realise his fleshy vision of human existence.
These etchings really are, as the old joke goes, black and white and
red all over.
Catrìona
Black, Sunday Herald 18.04.04