Looking
Both Ways: Art of the Contemporary African Diaspora
Until September 11
When the Hayward Gallery mounted their massive show, Africa Remix,
early this year, they hoped to show us that images of war and starvation
were not all the continent had to offer. Instead we were shown a vibrant
and dynamic Africa, bursting with ideas and creativity.
In the few short months since then, war and starvation have found
their way back to the top of our collective vision of Africa. Thats
a good thing, of course, if we can truly make a difference for millions
of impoverished people. But while were busy thinking about cancelling
Africas debts, we should consider the massive debt that we have
to pay to Africa.
Thats because Great Britain and most of her G8 cronies were
among the 14 countries at the Berlin Conference in 1884, where the
African map was crudely carved up and shared out. Much of the continents
current trouble can be traced back directly to the day those arbitrary,
straight-edged borders were drawn, with no regard to the social and
cultural realities on the ground.
National identity is, understandably, a pretty touchy subject for
African artists. The Haywards catalogue was full of hand-wringing
angst about the appropriateness of grouping such a disparate array
of people together under one cultural banner. Now Edinburgh has bagged
the first UK showing of another major contemporary African exhibition,
whose hand-wringing index is even higher.
Looking Both Ways, organised by New Yorks Museum for African
Art, is devoted to eleven African artists who live and work outside
the continent. These diasporan artists have left for various
reasons, ranging from civil war to artistic ambition. To meet with
international success, it is more or less necessary for African artists
to leave their country, an experience which will find much sympathy
in Scotland.
While some artistic exiles feel a deep connection to their home, others
prefer to blend into the global mainstream. But the mainstream has
other ideas: many of the artists in this show have found that, outside
Africa, they are expected to reflect publicly on their Africanness.
They have become the other, and are expected to make that
their subject.
This is where the hand-wringing starts; should the artists play up
their origins or dismiss them? And does it help to mount an exhibition
which further plays the African card? This exhibitions uneasy
self-justification echoes that of Africa Remix: there is no such movement
as African art, the curators say, and our disparate mix will prove
it.
Ten of the eleven artists in the Edinburgh show were also featured
in Africa Remix. Nothing was made of it at the time, but almost half
of the 86 artists shown there were diasporan. You could spot the difference
from a mile off: the international art scene may be diverse, but it
breeds a certain kind of approach to making art, and offers easy access
to certain kinds of materials. There was more uniformity amongst those
who had left Africa than those who had stayed.
So, Looking Both Ways is very much set in the context of western art.
It deals not simply with the experience of being African, but more
specifically with the experience of being African in the USA or Europe.
And, sometimes, more generally, with the experience of being caught
in the limbo between two lands.
Allan deSouzas Threshold Series is a case in point; a bank of
small, framed photos show futuristic airports and other in-between
places, empty of people and gleaming with chromed promise. They are
conveyor belts for human beings, their universal style of design disguising
their geographic locations. In these spaces, everyone is a nomad.
Zineb Sediras seven-screen video installation, On a Winters
Night a Traveller, continues this theme. A flight from London to Algiers
is documented from start to finish, and while the images are brutally
mundane, Sedira gets across the feeling of being everywhere and nowhere
simultaneously, stretched impossibly between two continents.
Yinka Shonibare, nominated for last years Turner Prize, dominates
the upper of the two exhibition floors with a typically theatrical
tableau. Scramble for Africa represents the Berlin Conference, and
in colourful style inspires disgust. Fourteen mannequins are dressed
in Shonibares trademark African fabrics, arguing over a 19th
century map of Africa.
The fabric, which everyone understands as quintessentially African,
was actually an import from Holland and Manchester. So, while the
14 non-African nations divvied up Africas borders, they rebranded
its cultural identity too.
This revision of Africas constructed image is also at the heart
of Hassan Musas project. His series of paintings on printed
fabric, called Who Needs Bananas?, recalls the 1920s Parisian star,
Josephine Baker, in her famously provocative poses. Dancing in nothing
but a string of bananas, Baker shrewdly exploited the stereotype of
primitive sexuality associated with African women. Musa disapproves
of contemporary African artists who bow to the same stereotyping pressures,
producing consciously African work to please the market.
The most alluring work in the show is that of New York-based Wangechi
Mutu, whose photomontages are brought to life with glorious passages
of ink. Her hybrid female figures are a deformed cross between pin-up
girls and scientific specimens. The mutant creatures, in their high-heeled
shoes, sit on toadstools and have blotches and protrusions everywhere.
These beautiful gargoyles are suggestive of modern womans self-mutilation
in the name of beauty. But they might also recall the days
horribly recent when Africans were caged for public spectacle.
Only five years ago did Spain return the stuffed body of an African
man which had been in their museum since 1916.
Thats the kind of history these artists all have to deal with.
Their great grandmothers might have been paraded as medical specimens
around Amsterdam. Their grandfathers might have been stuffed and captioned.
When the wounds are this fresh, no wonder identity is a thorny issue.
Catrìona Black, Sunday Herald 26.06.05